<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Techkeyla &#187; techmeme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techkeyla.com/tag/techmeme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techkeyla.com</link>
	<description>Served Neat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s First Marriage and all that lands up on Techmeme</title>
		<link>http://www.techkeyla.com/twitters-first-marriage-and-all-that-lands-up-on-techmeme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techkeyla.com/twitters-first-marriage-and-all-that-lands-up-on-techmeme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sujoy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techmeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techkeyla.com/twitters-first-marriage-and-all-that-lands-up-on-techmeme/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really couldn&#8217;t care less. I use Techmeme to see the upcoming headlines in the world of Technology. Not to be fed to some dumb tabloid-ish &#8216;news&#8217;. This incident happened on the 21st of March, and it has taken me some time to write about it. It was quite disturbing that even online journalism has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2339/2368571784_49bd1990f4.jpg?v=0" alt="Techmeme" align="left" />I really couldn&#8217;t care less. I use <a href="http://techmeme.com" title="Techmeme" target="_blank">Techmeme </a>to see the upcoming headlines in the world of Technology. Not to be fed to some dumb tabloid-ish &#8216;news&#8217;. This incident happened on the 21st of March, and it has taken me some time to write about it. It was quite disturbing that even online journalism has become prey to that damned thing called dumbing down. C&#8217;mon. What difference does it make if it was the first marriage proposal or the second or the 658th? Apparently there are discussions all across, and by that I mean respectable blogs we read &#8211; <a href="http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2008/03/sweetest-tweet.html" title="Wired Sweetest tweet" target="_blank">Wired </a>and <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/03/21/max-emily-twitter-proposal/" target="_blank">Mashable </a>to name a few. Discussions over the authenticity of the marriage or it being just a publicity stunt, or even the authenticity of it being the very FIRST one.<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2185/2367737525_d78e72ddd5.jpg?v=0" alt="Twitter" align="left" height="69" width="240" />First things first. SHUT UP. Let&#8217;s move ahead from the Twitter jungle and the low lives who feel it&#8217;s cool to propose the love of your &#8216;Virtual&#8217; Life on a Social Networking Tool. Is that how Life has shaped up. Are we moving ahead in a direction where proposing via SMS would become a norm. For the non-starters, here&#8217;s what actually got delivered. For the 140 character limit, the message had to crisp, sweet and precisely accurate without omitting any necessary emotions.</p>
<p>The message read: &#8220;To @emilychang &#8211; After fifteen years of blissful happiness I would like to ask for your hand in marriage?&#8221;</p>
<p>The reply, within a minute: &#8220;@maxkiesler &#8211; yes, i do.&#8221; Of course you do.!!!!</p>
<p>My question is to Techmeme. Is this what is meant by Tech-headlines? Lemme try create something more explosive and probably my blog could get bloated up in terms of incoming links from Techmeme. Here&#8217;s one for starters: Techmeme bashed by Techkeyla. Please oh Please try and avoid these stupid news and let them remain buried in the world of underground blogosphere.</p>
<p>P.S. Do read the comments on the post on <a href="http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2008/03/sweetest-tweet.html" target="_blank">Wired.com</a>. It&#8217;s a whole set of geeks talking of how they proposed by writing a UNIX main page so on and so forth. I predict that by the time the couple decides to split, Twitter will be acquired by either Microsoft or Google. But given, Google already own <a href="http://www.jaiku.com/" target="_blank">Jaiku</a>, chances are that Microsoft might head for Twitter, or may be not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techkeyla.com/twitters-first-marriage-and-all-that-lands-up-on-techmeme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the fuss about Naughty Ning?</title>
		<link>http://www.techkeyla.com/whats-the-fuss-about-naughty-ning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techkeyla.com/whats-the-fuss-about-naughty-ning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sujoy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech shots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techmeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techkeyla.com/whats-the-fuss-about-naughty-ning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me now that Tech News is in desperate need of something on the lines of tabloids or the P3 Glitterati; of course Porn being one of its Paris Hiltons. No one can doubt about the online traffic and revenue that porn generates, especially because of its paid nature and ahem! because of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2049/2171029743_358d6b1c10.jpg?v=0" alt="naughty ning" height="375" width="500" /></p>
<p>It seems to me now that Tech News is in desperate need of something on the lines of tabloids or the P3 Glitterati; of course Porn being one of its Paris Hiltons. No one can doubt about the online traffic and revenue that porn generates, especially because of its paid nature and ahem! because of its nature as well. Until well, Ning.com came up with the new in-thing-sub-domain parking of the porn kind, and well,shockingly, the entire web world stood up and took notice, like it never had been done before. In some way or the other, sub-domain hosting of pornography has always existed, well since Blogger or even WordPress days. Would love to know the statistics, as this is is going to be much larger than Ning&#8217;s.<span id="more-10"></span></p>
<p>Or just consider, the living room of Internet-MySpace where almost everyone has his/her presence felt, which again includes yummy profiles. So what exactly is the fuss about the Naughty Ning? I can see Google&#8217;s orkut feeling embarrassed now crying out loud, &#8221; Me too,..I also host online sluts , but where is my coverage ? &#8220;. Playboy University Social Network is built on Ning platform. Surprisingly here, nudity is strictly prohibited. Now that&#8217;s the news which should take center-stage.</p>
<p>As far as people into PORN are concerned, I guess there&#8217;s no stopping for them. If NING is going to get busted, there are a million others who are getting spawned as we speak. Do we need a <a href="http://techmeme.com">Techmeme</a> front page coverage for the other available options?</p>
<p>Sources:<a href="http://cpmadvisors.com/2008/ning-firing-on-all-cylinders-adult-content-play/">CPM Advisors</a>; <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/01/05/ning-shows-its-naughty-side/">Mashable</a>; <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/ning-a-porn-pusher">CenterNetworks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techkeyla.com/whats-the-fuss-about-naughty-ning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
